Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 06:34
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
American Airlines plane diverted because it was too big to land at airport - WKRC
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Culpa maxime qui ut ut aut in.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.